CO129-247 - Acting Governor Fleming Governor Des Voeus - 1890 [10-12] — Page 409

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

he was

the Clerk below him is given 35 per cent because / what will probably

appointed never happen again) he was from England. It is much more likely that the 1st Clerk will be also from England in future than,

I would therefore

Kai Z

raise the pay proper of the 1st Clerk

(as suggested;

Jan.11(4)

X

from $1920 (35 percent) to $2592 as the

+ f

Marriages)

for given $1875

-X-

They

4

288

the other office held by him [viz. Deputy Registration of] from $120 (20 percent) to $144

I let him retain his really

personal allowance of $120

Total Emoluments

making

Registrar of

$2690

#

not alter

this, but

see no reason

to alter it at any rate $201

$3000

p.19%

and Clerk Registration General's Office

They have given

him 35 percent

was appointed from England I have said above his

rise (as he was

Mangle

Ay

Successor will probably not be)

viz. from $1440

to $1944

I let him retain his personal

allowance also

In

2 according to ruling in para. Para an

1590/09-10 part at least of

disposable

an

that personal allowance should be

in the increase of salary,

marged

9

it was

(Enc. 9 tells us that) it inconsistent with fall in Exchange

of length of service.

Gwen in 188 as well as

It would be fair to dock him $120

which is

35

55%

At

$1875 rate

& therefore the correct

increase

M.Shepherd, Deputy

Advocate

which he

with formerly 1st Clerk in Sure. Can. Best)

holds an

office of which the 1875 Emoluments

were

$360

Total $2700

Halle

SHaut $2400

to

carefully

and the proposed increase to $3720 is therefore

(35% would actually come to

his personal allowance

$267

Z

boo

merged in their

or being properly merged increase (according to

according to anders on 100257

W. Ball, Interpreter, Supreme

Court

? Point out that Schedule (in Enc. 8) & Enc. 26 propose in this case an increase to $3600 (the pers. all. to be dropped) whereas in the Estimates $2592 is

is taken, the pers. all. of $400 being retained, and say that the latter is accordingly

sanctioned.

T. I Callen duties of Sanitary dept ? Observe similarly that in Enc. 3 and 26 he is set down at $3600, but

Edit History

2026-05-26 12:25:17 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
he was the Clerk below him is given 35 per cent because / what will probably appointed never happen again) he was from England. It is much more likely that the 1st Clerk will be also from England in future than, I would therefore Kai Z raise the pay proper of the 1st Clerk (as suggested; Jan.11(4) X from $1920 (35 percent) to $2592 as the + f Marriages) for given $1875 -X- They 4 288 the other office held by him [viz. Deputy Registration of] from $120 (20 percent) to $144 I let him retain his really personal allowance of $120 Total Emoluments making Registrar of $2690 # not alter this, but see no reason to alter it at any rate $201 $3000 p.19% and Clerk Registration General's Office They have given him 35 percent was appointed from England I have said above his rise (as he was Mangle Ay Successor will probably not be) viz. from $1440 to $1944 I let him retain his personal allowance also In 2 according to ruling in para. Para an 1590/09-10 part at least of disposable an that personal allowance should be in the increase of salary, marged 9 it was (Enc. 9 tells us that) it inconsistent with fall in Exchange of length of service. Gwen in 188 as well as It would be fair to dock him $120 which is 35 55% At $1875 rate & therefore the correct increase M.Shepherd, Deputy Advocate which he with formerly 1st Clerk in Sure. Can. Best) holds an office of which the 1875 Emoluments were $360 Total $2700 Halle SHaut $2400 to carefully and the proposed increase to $3720 is therefore (35% would actually come to his personal allowance $267 Z boo merged in their or being properly merged increase (according to according to anders on 100257 W. Ball, Interpreter, Supreme Court ? Point out that Schedule (in Enc. 8) & Enc. 26 propose in this case an increase to $3600 (the pers. all. to be dropped) whereas in the Estimates $2592 is is taken, the pers. all. of $400 being retained, and say that the latter is accordingly sanctioned. T. I Callen duties of Sanitary dept ? Observe similarly that in Enc. 3 and 26 he is set down at $3600, but
Baseline (Original)
he was the Clerk below him is given 35%er cent because / what will probably appointed never happen again) he Ian England. It is much mo liked that the 15t (lark will be ass from England in future than, I would therefort Kai Z raise the pay proper of the 154 (Cart (as suggested; Jan.11(4) X from $1920 (35 percent) to 182592 the the + f Marriages) fir given s 1875 -X- They 4 288 the other office held by him [wig. Deputy Registion of from 120 (20 percent) to I let him retain his really personal allowance of 18120 Total Emolu making misterd of 162904 # not alter this, het see no se it at an rat 201 3000 p.19% and Clark Registion feneral's Office They have given him 35 percent was app? from England I han said above his rise (as he was Mangle Ay Successor will probably not be) viz. from 10144o to #1944 I let him retain his persma allowance also Int 2 Ашој according to ruling in far. Pop an 1590/0q-qe part at least of disp an that personal allowance should be in the increase of salary, marged 9 it was (Enc. q tells us that) it inconsin of fall in Exchange of length of service. байса Gwen in 188 as wellas It would be fain t to dock him #120 I which is 35 55% At 1875rate & therefor the correct increase M.Shepherd, Deputy Adve which ho with firmerly 1st Clerk in Sure. Can. Best) holds an office of which the 907 1875 Emoluments андни 360 Total $2700 Halle SHaut 2400 to carech and the proposed increase to #3720 is therefor (35% would actually came to his personal allowance 7737267 Z boo merged in their or being properly merged increase (acending to (acending to anders on 100257 W. Ball, Interpreter, Supreme Court ? Point ant that Schedule (in Enc. 8) & Enc. 26 propose in this case an increase to #3600 (the pass. all. to be dropped) whereas in the Estimates 1825927 is is taken, the pers. all. of $400 being retained, and say that the latter is accordingly sanxtimed. T. I Callen dufti of Sanitary def ? Observe similarly that in Enc. 3 and 26 he is set down at $3600, but t
2026-05-26 12:25:17 · Baseline
View content

he was

the Clerk below him is given 35%er cent because / what will probably

appointed never happen again) he Ian England. It is much mo liked that the 15t (lark will be ass from England in future than,

I would therefort

Kai Z

raise the pay proper of the 154 (Cart

(as suggested;

Jan.11(4)

X

from $1920 (35 percent) to 182592 the the

+ f

Marriages)

fir given s 1875

-X-

They

4

288

the other office held by him [wig. Deputy Registion of from 120 (20 percent) to I let him retain his really

personal allowance of 18120

Total Emolu

making

misterd of

162904

#

not alter

this, het

see no se

it at an rat 201

3000

p.19%

and Clark Registion feneral's Office

They have given

him 35 percent

was app? from England I han said above his

rise (as he was

Mangle

Ay

Successor will probably not be)

viz. from 10144o

to #1944

I let him retain his persma

allowance also

Int

2 Ашој according to ruling in far. Pop an

1590/0q-qe part at least of

disp

an

that personal allowance should be

in the increase of salary,

marged

9

it was

(Enc. q tells us that) it inconsin of fall in Exchange

of length of service.

байса

Gwen in 188 as wellas

It would be fain t to dock him #120

I which is

35

55%

At

1875rate

& therefor the correct

increase

M.Shepherd, Deputy

Adve

which ho

with firmerly 1st Clerk in Sure. Can. Best)

holds an

office of which the 907

1875 Emoluments

андни

360

Total $2700

Halle

SHaut 2400

to

carech

and the proposed increase to #3720 is therefor

(35% would actually came to

his personal allowance

7737267 Z

boo

merged in their

or being properly merged increase (acending to

(acending to anders on 100257

W. Ball, Interpreter, Supreme

Court

? Point ant that Schedule (in Enc. 8) & Enc. 26 propose in this case an increase to #3600 (the pass. all. to be dropped) whereas in the Estimates 1825927 is

is taken, the pers. all. of $400 being retained, and say that the latter is accordingly

sanxtimed.

T. I Callen dufti of Sanitary def ? Observe similarly that in Enc. 3 and 26 he is set down at $3600, but

t

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.